NEW YORK (AP)—Locked-out NBA players
including Carmelo Anthony(notes) and Kevin Durant(notes) filed class-action antitrust lawsuits
against the league on Tuesday in at least two states, saying David Stern’s
ultimatums left them no other choice.
Attorney David Boies, who represented the
NFL during that sport’s work stoppage and now has been brought aboard by
basketball’s players, said the NBA lockout
violates antitrust laws by refusing to allow players to work.
Boies added that Stern’s ultimatum to the
now-disbanded union to accept the owners’ last economic model or face a harsher proposal “turned out to be a
mistake” that strengthens the players’ case because it proves that the
collective bargaining process had ended.
“If you’re in a poker game, and
you run a bluff, and the bluff works, you’re a hero. If someone calls your
bluff, you lose. I think the owners overplayed their hand,” Boies said at the
players’ association headquarters. “They did a terrific job of taking a very
hard line and pushing the players to make concession after concession after
concession, but greed is not only a terrible thing—it’s a dangerous thing.”
Dangerous enough to cost the league
billions of dollars in damages if players win.
The players are seeking “treble
damages”—meaning triple the amount of the more than $2 billion they would have made under a full
2011-12 season—for what they argue is irreparable harm by preventing them from
playing in their “very short” NBA careers.
“We haven’t seen Mr. Boies’ complaint
yet, but it’s a shame that the players have chosen
to litigate instead of negotiate,” NBA spokesman
Tim Frank said in a statement. “They warned us from the early days of these
negotiations that they would sue us if we didn’t satisfy them at the bargaining
table, and they appear to have followed through on their threats.”
Boies acknowledged that the case could
take months, but hoped there would be a settlement before too long.
“Nobody can tell you how long it’s going
to take. We all know it’s possible to delay lawsuits for a while, but I think
it is in everybody’s interest to try to resolve this promptly,” said Boies,
speaking on behalf of the California
filing. “The longer it goes on, the greater the damages that the teams will
face, the greater the damages that the players will suffer, and perhaps most
important of all, the longer basketball fans will be deprived of basketball. So
we hope that this will move quickly.”
He insisted the players have shown their
willingness to negotiate throughout.
“You can’t negotiate by yourself,” he
said. “You can only negotiate if you’ve got somebody who’s willing to sit down
and negotiate with you.”
The two suits—one filed in conjunction
with the players’ association in the Northern District of California and
another filed in Minnesota —likely
were filed with a favorable venue in mind.
The Minnesota district court has been favorable
to the NFLPA during litigation dating to the 1980s. The federal court in San Francisco is under
the jurisdiction of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, considered the most
liberal of the 13 circuit courts.
The NBA
already has filed a pre-emptive lawsuit in New York seeking to prove the
lockout is legal and likely would push for cases to be moved there to gain the
legal home court.
Though Stern has ridiculed the players’
“losing” strategy, Boies said he believes NBA players have a stronger case than
NFL players did. Their decertification, he said, could have been argued as a
sham because they walked out on the bargaining process before it was
technically over and brought litigation. He said Stern’s actions left NBA
players without options beyond seeking legal relief.
“Here you had an ultimatum from the
owners that made absolutely clear that the collective bargaining process was
over,” he said, adding that Stern’s threat is quoted in the lawsuit. “That’s
not collective bargaining, and so you have a very distinct set of facts here.”
The California filing says that in 2007, Stern
met with union negotiators and demanded the players reduce their revenue share
from 57 percent to no more than 50 percent and “insisted on a much more
restrictive salary cap, which would restrict the market for player services.”
Stern threatened at that meeting,
according to the lawsuit, that the league was “prepared to lock out the players
for two years to get everything” that the NBA owners
sought and that “the deal would only get worse after the lockout.”
The league locked out its players on July
1. Tuesday marked the 138th day of the lockout and the players’ first missed
paycheck. The season was scheduled to start Nov. 1, but already games through
Dec. 15 have been canceled—a total of 324 or
26 percent of the season.
The league’s latest proposal, which was
rejected by the players on Monday, called for a reduced 72-game season to start
Dec. 15.
Although the NFL was able to get its
recent labor dispute resolved quickly enough to lose only one preseason game,
the NHL lost the entire 2004-05 season, and the NBA’s
last work stoppage led to a 50-game season
in 1998-99.
Boies said players will not seek a
preliminary injunction to lift the lockout. Because the lockout “arguably grew
out of prior collective bargaining discussions,” Boies said he believes it
would be very difficult to get a court to immediately halt the lockout and such
a path would delay the case.
Anthony and Chauncey Billups(notes) of the Knicks, NBA scoring leader
Durant, rookie Kawhi Leonard(notes) and Grizzlies forward Leon Powe(notes) were listed as plaintiffs in the
complaint filed in conjunction with the players’ association in the Northern
District of California against the NBA and the owners of its 30 teams. That
case has been assigned for now to U.S. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu in Oakland , Calif.
Timberwolves forward Anthony Tolliver(notes), Pistons guard Ben Gordon(notes), free agent forward Caron Butler(notes) andDerrick Williams(notes)—the
second overall draft pick by Minnesota in June who has yet to sign a rookie
contract because of the lockout— were listed as plaintiffs in another lawsuit
filed against the league and owners in Minneapolis, where NFL players had some
level of success in a similar court proceeding this summer.
Boies said there might be other, similar
cases to those filed on behalf of NBA players
in California and Minnesota . The ideal scenario, he said,
would be to bring them all together in the Northern District of California.
The plaintiffs represent various types of
players affected by lockout— those under contract, free agents and rookies.
They argue in the Minnesota filing that the lockout
“constitutes an illegal group boycott, price-fixing agreement, and/or restraint
of trade in violation of the Sherman Act” and that the owners’ final offer for
a new CBA would have “wiped out the competitive market for most NBA players.”
Boies said the lawsuit was an attempt to
restore competitive free-market conditions
Players made numerous economic
concessions and were willing to meet the owners’ demands of a 50-50 split of
basketball-related income—a transfer of about
$280 million annually from their feeling the league’s desires to improve
competitive balance would hurt their guaranteed
57 percent under the old deal— but only if the owners met them on their
system wishes.
Owners wanted to keep more of the
league’s nearly $4 billion in basketball revenues. And they sought a system
where even the smallest-market clubs could compete, believing the current
system would always favor the teams who could spend the most.
And Boies said it was those owners who
put the league in this position.
“If it were up to the players, there
would be games being played right now,” he said. “There is one reason and one
reason only that the season is in jeopardy and that is because the owners have
locked the players out and have maintained that lockout for several months.
“If there’s not a basketball season,
responsibility for that lies in one place and one place only, and that is the NBA and the NBA owners
because they’re the ones who are keeping the players from playing.”
AP Sports Writer Jon Krawczynski in Minneapolis contributed
to this report.
No comments:
Post a Comment